<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark Bold</title>
	<link>http://markbold.com</link>
	<description>Personal website and portfolio of Mark Bold</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Meeting Colin Wilson</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2008/04/19/meeting-colin-wilson/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2008/04/19/meeting-colin-wilson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.com/2008/04/19/meeting-colin-wilson/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are few subjects that Colin Wilson does not feel compelled to write a book about.  His output over the last fifty years, since the momentous release of his existentialist handbook The Outsider, has been over 100 volumes on crime, the occult, science fiction and fantasy, the paranormal, pop psychology and just about any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are few subjects that Colin Wilson does not feel compelled to write a book about.  His output over the last fifty years, since the momentous release of his existentialist handbook <em>The Outsider</em>, has been over 100 volumes on crime, the occult, science fiction and fantasy, the paranormal, pop psychology and just about any cranky subject that approaches his radar. What marks these books out is that they are usually argued from Wilson&#8217;s New Existentialist standpoint as he manages to shoehorn in his obsessive concepts of optimism and heightened consciousness.  Yesterday he was in Stratford to talk about his next book, this time taking on Shakespearean scholarship. Just how he&#8217;s going to fuse his &#8220;peak experience&#8221; philosophy with the work of the &#8220;second-rate&#8221; Bard remains to be seen.<br />
 <a href="http://markbold.com/2008/04/19/meeting-colin-wilson/#more-63" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2008/04/19/meeting-colin-wilson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The atheist delusion</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2008/03/16/the-atheist-delusion/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2008/03/16/the-atheist-delusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.com/2008/03/16/the-atheist-delusion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Gray is writing in the Guardian about fundamentalist atheists (again).  &#8220;It is a funny sort of humanism that condemns an impulse that is peculiarly human. Yet that is what evangelical atheists do when they demonise religion.&#8221; It is an excellent critique of zealots like Dawkins, Dennett and Hitchens, and the progress and eventual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Gray is writing <a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/departments/politicsphilosophyandsociety/story/0,,2265446,00.html">in the Guardian</a> about fundamentalist atheists (again).  &#8220;It is a funny sort of humanism that condemns an impulse that is peculiarly human. Yet that is what evangelical atheists do when they demonise religion.&#8221; It is an excellent critique of zealots like Dawkins, Dennett and Hitchens, and the progress and eventual new dawn for humanity that their atheist project seems to promise, using the same tilts against secular humanism that were found in <a href="http://markbold.com/2008/01/12/straw-dogs/">Straw Dogs</a> and Black Mass.  Very enjoyable and thought-provoking, but I always wonder what sort of solution Gray would offer to the problems he identifies.  He&#8217;s assured at corroding others&#8217; arguments and pointing out contradictions, creating a terrible pessimism in his writing, but how does he assure himself that it&#8217;s worth getting up in the morning?</p>
<p>(For a little balance, and to refresh your belief in progress, try <a href="http://newhumanist.org.uk/1423">AC Grayling&#8217;s criticisms</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2008/03/16/the-atheist-delusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Famous 5 -1 scoreline</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2008/03/06/famous-5-1-scoreline/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2008/03/06/famous-5-1-scoreline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.com/2008/03/06/germany-1-england-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gaffr blog is today dealing with a subject that maybe more than anything rekindled the nation&#8217;s footballing spirit at the beginning of the millennium - the famous 5 -1 scoreline against Germany in 2001. gaffr looks back at how it happened&#8230;
gaffr blog - retrospective

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://markbold.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/german-1-england5.thumbnail.gif" class="alignright" alt="Football formations for Germany - England" />The gaffr blog is today dealing with a subject that maybe more than anything rekindled the nation&#8217;s footballing spirit at the beginning of the millennium - the famous 5 -1 scoreline against Germany in 2001. gaffr looks back at how it happened&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.gaffr.com/2008/03/05/germany-1-england-5/" class="external">gaffr blog - retrospective<br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2008/03/06/famous-5-1-scoreline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There Will Be Blood</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2008/03/05/there-will-be-blood/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2008/03/05/there-will-be-blood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.com/2008/03/05/there-will-be-blood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is blood, and it&#8217;s all over the floor just at the end of the movie, just when I thought Daniel Day-Lewis&#8217; performance had somehow lost its way, and the story had arrived at an all too abrupt ending.
Day-Lewis is easy to criticise because he is so far beyond the abilities of just about every [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is blood, and it&#8217;s all over the floor just at the end of the movie, just when I thought Daniel Day-Lewis&#8217; performance had somehow lost its way, and the story had arrived at an all too abrupt ending.</p>
<p>Day-Lewis is easy to criticise because he is so far beyond the abilities of just about every other actor making a living in the movies.  Every one of his films is a must-see simply because each one of his performances is entirely compelling.  And especially so Daniel Plainview, the silver prospector turned oilman in There Will Be Blood.  The entire film is about him, and that it is billed as an epic, takes place across decades of time and every shot is a giant historic panorama only serves to underline the enormity of this man&#8217;s talent.</p>
<p>The best aspect of the film is what we don&#8217;t know about Plainview.  What we do know about him we know immediately from the silent opening: the hazardous solitary work in grim mines, the injuries and determination, the wordless acceptance of the struggle of life.  And this grim determination grows throughout the film, it&#8217;s his calling card, it&#8217;s why he becomes so malignantly successful.  But what we never really understand about him is the best part of Day-Lewis&#8217; subtle performance.  It is the battle with the religious fervour of Eli Sunday, from the initial refusal to join hands in prayer, through beating him up in a seeming revenge attack for the injuries to Plainview&#8217;s adopted son, to the final bloody confrontation that adds such a depth to the character.  A facile filmmaker might have contrived a source for this anger; Paul Thomas Anderson leaves it to the towering abilities of his leading actor to create a truly complicated human subject.</p>
<p>But the contradictions implode at the end, out of all proportion; the millionaire languishing in a lonely mansion until fateful visits from both his adopted son and then his preacher adversary push the subtlety aside. The madness, the slight quirkiness and determination of Plainview explode in apparent overacting, and there&#8217;s blood, &#8220;milkshake&#8221; and an Oscar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2008/03/05/there-will-be-blood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Straw Dogs</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2008/01/12/straw-dogs/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2008/01/12/straw-dogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.local/2008/01/31/straw-dogs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the second section of Straw Dogs, John Gray makes a suggestion that is perhaps the aim of his book: &#8216;to discover which illusions we can give up, and which we will never shake off&#8217; (p83). It is a fact, he says, that human beings cannot live without illusion. The belief that we can is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the second section of <em>Straw Dogs</em>, John Gray makes a suggestion that is perhaps the aim of his book: &#8216;to discover which illusions we can give up, and which we will never shake off&#8217; (p83). It is a fact, he says, that human beings cannot live without illusion. The belief that we can is just one of the illusions we need to shake off, and Gray traces the roots of this misconception through a sustained attack on the over-rational, anthropocentric beliefs of liberal humanism.</p>
<p> <a href="http://markbold.com/2008/01/12/straw-dogs/#more-43" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2008/01/12/straw-dogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to be Alone</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2008/01/03/how-to-be-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2008/01/03/how-to-be-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.local/2008/01/31/how-to-be-alone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best essays in Jonathan Franzen&#8217;s collection How To Be Alone are really only a set of appendices to his bestselling novel The Corrections; some of the others, although often thought-provoking and very well-written, seem to exist only to crave attention, and have little substance other than providing an insight into the author&#8217;s self-absorption and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best essays in Jonathan Franzen&#8217;s collection <em>How To Be Alone</em> are really only a set of appendices to his bestselling novel <em>The Corrections</em>; some of the others, although often thought-provoking and very well-written, seem to exist only to crave attention, and have little substance other than providing an insight into the author&#8217;s self-absorption and exploration of his American identity. But in the interstices of the collection, there are some refreshing and revealing insights into the nature of modernity, and into a mass culture that is frighteningly out of control.</p>
<p> <a href="http://markbold.com/2008/01/03/how-to-be-alone/#more-47" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2008/01/03/how-to-be-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If This is a Man</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2007/11/29/if-this-is-a-man/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2007/11/29/if-this-is-a-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.local/2008/01/31/if-this-is-a-man/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Primo Levi did not want a film or theatrical adaptation made of his Auschwitz memoir If This Is A Man. It is not difficult to see why, given the way Hollywood rewrites history and trivialises human experience. Imagine how a Zemeckis-Hanks film of Levi&#8217;s testimony would ladle on the sentimentalism and sensation until it became [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Primo Levi did not want a film or theatrical adaptation made of his Auschwitz memoir <em>If This Is A Man</em>. It is not difficult to see why, given the way Hollywood rewrites history and trivialises human experience. Imagine how a Zemeckis-Hanks film of Levi&#8217;s testimony would ladle on the sentimentalism and sensation until it became an obscene tear-jerking hero myth of one man&#8217;s struggle against his Nazi oppressors. No, actually don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Instead, <em>If This Is A Man</em> is free of all sentimentalism, and does not turn away from describing the full horror of a work camp within Auschwitz in clear and calm prose. There is no self-pity, or a defining moment that makes a man determined to survive; there is no place in the memoir where it is the heroic character of the narrator that leads to his final freedom. This is a simple and honest account of what happened to an Italian Jew when he was transported to Auschwitz.</p>
<p> <a href="http://markbold.com/2007/11/29/if-this-is-a-man/#more-48" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2007/11/29/if-this-is-a-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kafka</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2007/11/26/kafka/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2007/11/26/kafka/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.local/2008/01/31/kafka/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;As Shakespeare spoke for mankind on the threshold of the modern world, you speak mankind&#8217;s farewell in the authentic voice of the twentieth century.&#8221;
Alan Bennett directs these words at Kafka from the character of Max Brod (Kafka&#8217;s best friend and executor) in his play Kafka&#8217;s Dick. There is no doubting Kafka&#8217;s position as one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>&#8220;As Shakespeare spoke for mankind on the threshold of the modern world, you speak mankind&#8217;s farewell in the authentic voice of the twentieth century.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Alan Bennett directs these words at Kafka from the character of Max Brod (Kafka&#8217;s best friend and executor) in his play <em>Kafka&#8217;s Dick</em>. There is no doubting Kafka&#8217;s position as one of the greatest writers of modernity, but the writer and man himself tends to be hidden in the shadow of this reputation, or, more often perhaps, confused with the main characters in his stories and novels. The story of his life may be quite well known to readers of Kafka through the publication of his diaries and voluminous correspondence with the women he was often engaged to, but it is to rescue Kafka from the simplifications of the adjective Kafkaesque that Murray has written this new biography.</p>
<p> <a href="http://markbold.com/2007/11/26/kafka/#more-50" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2007/11/26/kafka/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sleepwalkers</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2007/10/18/the-sleepwalkers/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2007/10/18/the-sleepwalkers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.local/2008/01/31/the-sleepwalkers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;The revolutions of thought which shape the basic outlook of an age are not disseminated through text-books - they spread like epidemics, through contamination by invisible agents and innocent germ-carriers, by the most varied form of contact, or simply by breathing the common air.&#8217; (1979, p151)
Koestler is describing the impact of the Copernican revolution in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>&#8216;The revolutions of thought which shape the basic outlook of an age are not disseminated through text-books - they spread like epidemics, through contamination by invisible agents and innocent germ-carriers, by the most varied form of contact, or simply by breathing the common air.&#8217; (1979, p151)</p></blockquote>
<p>Koestler is describing the impact of the Copernican revolution in the sixteenth century, comparing it to changes in belief that spread through Western society from the work of other writers, such as Darwin and Marx. The terminology is eerily memetic, yet his real concern is to show how established ideas (in this case the Ptolemaic belief that the sun revolves around the earth) hold sway over thinkers until there is a sudden break with the past, and a completely new belief system becomes accepted. The process of scientific advance he describes is very similar to the paradigm shift, introduced by Thomas Kuhn in <em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em> (published within a few years of <em>The Sleepwalkers</em>), and now a familiar term. Both writers are trying to show that science does not move forward in a gradual advance of knowledge, but in fact jumps forward and sometimes sideways in leaps and gear shifts.</p>
<p> <a href="http://markbold.com/2007/10/18/the-sleepwalkers/#more-52" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2007/10/18/the-sleepwalkers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam&#8217;s Curse</title>
		<link>http://markbold.com/2007/10/12/adams-curse/</link>
		<comments>http://markbold.com/2007/10/12/adams-curse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markbold.local/2008/01/31/adams-curse/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Bryan Sykes, an Oxford Professor of Human Genetics, started out on this book by attempting a serious study of the Y-chromosome, and the ability this gives geneticists to trace paternal descent and the groupings and origins of the common male ancestors of all people on the planet. He had achieved a similar study of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Bryan Sykes, an Oxford Professor of Human Genetics, started out on this book by attempting a serious study of the Y-chromosome, and the ability this gives geneticists to trace paternal descent and the groupings and origins of the common male ancestors of all people on the planet. He had achieved a similar study of mitochondrial DNA and our common female ancestors with <em>The Seven Daughters of Eve</em>. But this time maybe the publishers insisted that he rewrite his manuscript with a slightly hysterical style, speculate about how men are doomed, and slap the dystopian title <em>Adam&#8217;s Curse, A Future Without Men</em> (together with a misleading picture of monkeys becoming men becoming women) on the front cover. The result is a strangely uneven mix of scientific explanation and wild speculation.</p>
<p> <a href="http://markbold.com/2007/10/12/adams-curse/#more-44" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markbold.com/2007/10/12/adams-curse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
